Cases 61 - 70 of 130
Rios v. Austin et al
as 2:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Constance Rios
Defendant:
John Michael Austin and Cummins Chevrolet Buick GMC Cadillac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv02730
Plaintiff:
John Michael Garza
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Redus v. CSPH Inc
as 3:2015cv02364
Plaintiff:
John Michael Redus
Defendant:
CSPH Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ellington et al v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Heathyr J Ellington, John Michael Ellington and Michael Earl Ellington, Deceased
Defendant:
Globalrehab Management, LLC, Metro Ambulance Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Stephen Farmer, et al v. D&O Contractors, Inc., et al
as 15-30297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN FARMER, FARMER ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, CURT C. CAUSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D&O CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED, JOHN MICHAEL O'MALLEY, also known as Mike O'Malley, DANIEL P. WAGNER, also known as Dan Wagner and others
Hoyne
as 6:2015cv01055
Plaintiff:
John Michael Hoyne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoyne
as 6:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
John Michael Hoyne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoyne et al v Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
John Michael Hoyne and Barbara Hoyne
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv04384
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arch Insurance Company v. Nations Construction Management Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04369
Plaintiff:
Arch Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nations Construction Management Inc and John Michael Czapski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
