Cases 61 - 70 of 1,369
Aguilar Morales et al v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Armando Aguilar Morales, J.J. A.R., Pedro Ramos Perez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez
as 23-50480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant / Appellee:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Ramos v. Erwin et al
as 4:2023cv02517
Plaintiff:
Alberto Ramos
Defendant:
Scott Erwin, Jennifer Gilbreath, Hallie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramos v. Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv02722
Plaintiff:
Jay Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC, Hilton Worldwide, Inc., John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Galindo v. Walden
as 7:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Ramos Galindo
Defendant:
Judge Missi Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LULAC v. Guillen
as 22-50407
Plaintiff / Appellee:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sheila Jackson Lee, Alexander Green, Jasmine Crockett and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Texas House Members, Ryan Guillen, Brooks Landgraf, and John Lujan, Ryan Guillen, Texas House Member, Brooks Landgraf, Texas House Member and others
v. Ruben Dario Ramos Vazquez
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Ruben Dario Ramos Vazquez
Ramos-Mendes v. Garland
as 23-60353
Petitioner:
Heydi Marcly Ramos-Mendes
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
