Cases 61 - 70 of 124
Yawn et al v. Bowie et al
as 3:2014cv00466
Defendant:
Robert J Bowie and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Blake A Yawn and William Stacy Yawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lopez v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Marisela Lopez
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Villanueva v. United States Marshals Service
as 3:2013cv00250
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Petitioner:
Luis Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garry Gallardo v. USA
as 13-50633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY DAVID GALLARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (United States Marshals Service)
Steven Perez v. USA, et al
as 13-40659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN REYNALDO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Southern District of Texas, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, Southern District of Texas and others
Franklin Williams v. Mike Pearce, et al
as 13-50377
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and MIKE PEARCE, Warden, FCI Bastrop
Lamonda v. United States Marshal's Service
as 3:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
C Keith Lamonda
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Williams v. Mike Pearce, et al
as 13-50170
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE PEARCE, Warden, FCI Bastrop and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Rhonda Fleming v. USA, et al
as 13-10042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONDA FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LESLIE POWERS, GEO GROUP and others
Sanchez v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2012cv00088
Defendant:
GEO Corrections, Val Verde Correctional Facility and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
George Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
