Cases 71 - 80 of 640
Farrington v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03546
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Farrington
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Gottfried v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03548
Plaintiff:
Seth Gottfried
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Sadowski v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03550
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Maxim v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
Alex Maxim
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Horton et al v. Central Loan Administration and Reporting et al
as 4:2019cv03456
Defendant:
AMCAP Mortgage, Ltd, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Delaina S Brown-Horton and Joseph M Horton
Dennis Williams, et al v. Community Bank, Ellisville, et al
as 19-60595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS WILLIAMS, MARY ANN WILLIAMS and CARRIA WILLIAMS WALTER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNITY OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED, COMMUNITY BANK OF ELLISVILLE, COMMUNITY BANCSHARES OF MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartkovich v DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01136
Plaintiff:
Marianne Bartkovich
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
