Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Davis v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00143
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Homer Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00159
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feast v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Feast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00122
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Savalas Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devall v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00154
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Devall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Fenwick Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Deville et al
as 1:2016cv01361
Plaintiff:
Jonica Haamid Phillips
Defendant:
Keith Deville, Kevin Jordan, Lacour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company
as 2:2015cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jordan
Defendant:
Ensco Offshore Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
