Cases 81 - 90 of 23,818
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40357
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
