Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Enriquez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Reymundo Enriquez and Sylvia R Enriquez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cevallos Sarzosa v. Vergara Enriquez
as 3:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Allan Andres Cevallos Sarzosa
Respondent:
Cryster Dennisse Vergara Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 ICARA
Wisener v. Enriquez-Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Ariel Ann Wisener
Defendant:
Carlos Enriquez-Torres and AV Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Enriquez v. Steinger, Greene & Feiner, LLC
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Pamela Enriquez
Defendant:
Steinger, Greene & Feiner, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Enriquez v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Emilio Enriquez
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Enriquez v. DHS Immigration
as 24-20035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration Department, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and others
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC v. Argueta et al
as 4:2023cv04378
Plaintiff:
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC
Defendant:
Pedro Argueta and Samuel Enriquez Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
