Cases 1 - 10 of 7,767
Kemp v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Mary Kemp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hogue v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hogue
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
New Orleans Property Holdings, LLC v. J. Blakeman Construction, LLC
as 2:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
New Orleans Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
J. Blakeman Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Brown v. Lumen Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Lumen Technologies Inc., Kate Johnson, Quincy L. Allen and others
Menard et al v. USA
as 6:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Herbert L Menard and Charlotte J Menard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hill v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Snow et al v. City of Alexandria et al
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Trayce Snow, Gerber M Porter and Agnes J Francisco
Defendant:
City of Alexandria and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Consolidated Grain and Barge Co v. J & P Spence Farm Operations L L C
as 3:2024cv00773
Defendant:
J&P Spence Farm Operations, LLC and Spence Farm Operations L L C
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman, Randy Smith, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
