Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant: Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. v. BabyBjorn AB
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc.
Defendant: BabyBjorn AB
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Scott v. Higgins et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant: District Attorney Kelly Higgins and District Attorney Jennifer Feldman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baby's Coffee, LLC v. Hess et al
as 2:2023cv07427
Plaintiff: Baby's Coffee, LLC
Defendant: Elizabeth Hess, Baby's New Orleans, LLC and Elizabeth Hess doing business as Baby's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Scott v. Santos
as 23-50853
Plaintiff / Appellant: Phillip G. Scott, also known as Baby Shark
Defendant / Appellee: Juan Santos, New Braunfels Police Officer, Brian Delgado, New Braunfels Police Officer, Brent McGuire, New Braunfels Police Officer and others
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2023cv01340
Petitioner: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent: Sheriff Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Feldman et al
as 5:2023cv01199
Plaintiff: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant: Ms. Jennifer M. Feldman, Ms. FNU Frazier, Unknown NBPD Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv01197
Plaintiff: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott and Samuel Ryan West
Defendant: Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Cpl. FNU Jones, Sgt. FNU Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Kimbro, et al et al
as 5:2023cv00983
Plaintiff: Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant: Comal County Jail Administrator Mark Reynolds and Staff, Mark Reynolds, Sergeant F/N/U Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patoli et al v. Baby Trend, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02044
Defendant: Baby Trend, Inc.
Claimant: Mahab Patoli and Sammia Frough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?