Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Behling v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and TX Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez Behl v. Abbott et al
as 3:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Frank Alvarez Behl
Respondent:
Greg Abbott, Bobby Lumpkin, Huntsville Parole Board Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Behling v. Three Warden Staff
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Respondent:
Three Warden Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Behling v. Three Warden Staff
as 4:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Scott T. Behling
Defendant:
Three Warden Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Behling v. TX Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Defendant:
TX Board of Pardons & Paroles, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and 194th Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bratton et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2021cv02165
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Pastor, Behling & Wheeler LLC and Environmental Resources Management Southwest, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Mallard and Donald Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Behling v. Kiel et al
as 6:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Defendant:
Paul Kiel, Mark W Michaels Unit Administrative Staff and TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behling v. LNU
as 3:2021cv00821
Defendant:
FNU LNU 3:20-cv-3587
Petitioner:
Scott T Behling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behling v. Crissup
as 3:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Defendant:
Kenneth Crissup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behling v. Virden et al
as 3:2020cv03587
Plaintiff:
Scott T Behling
Defendant:
Robert N Virden and Vannessa Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.