Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupre Logistics, LLC v. Greenberg, et al.
as 4:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Dupre Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Shannan L. Greenberg, Logan A. Coffman and Quantix Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Coffman v. Delgado Hernandez et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Andres N Delgado Hernandez, Matthew R Tiffin, Antonious D Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. William P Clements Unit
as 4:2022cv00877
Petitioner:
Dan Coffman
Respondent:
William P Clements Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Unknown Medical Provider et al
as 3:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Provider, Unknown Estelle Unit UTMB Provider, Jeremy Samuel Somerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Byerly et al
as 9:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Michael Byerly, Sean Bridges, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Saul
as 4:2021cv02393
Plaintiff:
Lisa Yvette Coffman
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Neal v. Reed et al
as 9:2021cv00003
Respondent:
Bruce Johnson, Tiffany Long, Jaquille Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Reed et al DO NOT DOCKET. Case electronically transferred to the USDC, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.
as 4:2020cv04381
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Terry Andrews, Jessica Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
