Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
USA v. Carvajal Bruzual
as 24-10279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Jesus Carvajal Bruzual
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Castillo v. Jantex Building Care, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Adrian Castillo
Defendant:
Jantex Building Care, LLC and Blanca Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TARAZONA CARVAJAL et al v. MIJELUM, L.L.C.
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
AURELIO TARAZONA CARVAJAL, EDUAR HURTADO GARCIA, ELKIN HUMBERTO GMEZ PINTO and others
Defendant:
MIJELUM, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Fitch v. USA
as 23-40131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Adams v. Shelby et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Michael Carvajal, Mike Piasiensk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
