Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Meyers et al v. Crane Company et al
as 2:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Debra Dummitt Meyers and Ronald T. Palermo
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benson v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02138
Plaintiff:
Lee H Benson and Lucy W. Benson
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CBS Corporation, Clark-Reliance Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Warren Pumps, LLC and IMO Industries, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Lee H Benson and Lucy W. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ai Diversity-Asbestos-Personal Injury
Wall et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Wall and Sandra S. Wall
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Armstrong International, Inc., Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkpatrick v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al .
as 4:2010cv01239
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co. , Babcock Borsig Power, Inc. , Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Moore Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Watson v. Hopeman Brothers et al
as 1:2007cv00468
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Watson and Richard L. Watson
Defendant:
Hopeman Brothers, S B Decking, Inc., Enpro Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
