Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hudson Specialty Insurance Company v. Walker Telecom, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Black Gap, LLC, Jennifer Walker, Clayton Walker, Individually, and D/B/A Walker Construction, Plains Pipeline, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stephen Walker v. Michael Savers, et al
as 15-10364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C. WALKER, also known as Stephen Clayton Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. SAVERS, JIMMY CORLEY, GRANDVILLE SANDERS and others
Stephen Walker v. TX Dept of Criminal Justice, et al
as 13-10408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C. WALKER, also known as Stephen Clayton Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. SAVERS, JIMMY CORLEY, GRANDVILLE SANDERS and others
Stephen Walker v. Deana Davi
as 12-11036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C. WALKER, also known as Stephen Clayton Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
DEANA DAVIS
USA v. Gary Walker
as 12-60233
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY CLAYTON WALKER
PLS Financial Services, Inc. v. Steinberg, Owens & Stern, L.P. et al
as 4:2010cv03325
Plaintiff:
PLS Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Steinberg, Owens & Stern, L.P., Clayton Walker & Gibbs Legal Processing, Shantel Walker Bias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. USA
as 1:2010cv00445
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Clayton Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephen Walker v. Joe Nunn, et al
as 10-10452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C WALKER, also known as Stephen Clayton Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE S NUNN, Individual and Official Capacity, BRUCE ZELLERS, Region 5 Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Official Capacity, GLEN H. WHITFIELD, Associate Warden, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
