Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clervrain v. Chapa
as 21-40123
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Laguna, Correctional Psychologist, in his/her Individual and Official Capacity, B. Gann, Correctional Operation Lieutenant, in his/her Individual and Official Capacity, A. Collins, Correctional Counselor, in his/her Individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manetirony Clervrain
Husband v. Warden Shults et al
as 1:2020cv00408
Defendant:
Unit Manager J. Tenner, Warden Shults and Corrections Counselor J. Bangart
Petitioner:
Eunice Husband
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Steven Ferguson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. TRAVIS BRAGG, LEO LAWRENCE ALTENBERG, Medical Doctor, Clinical Director, RODRIGO CHAVEZ, Health Services Administrator and others
Kamal Patel v. Ronald Thompson, et al
as 10-11061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HARO, Warden - FCI Big Spring, W. A. SHERROD, Associate Warden, TREVINO TAPIA, Associate Warden and others
Edward Ashford v. USA, et al
as 10-40804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD DWAYNE ASHFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RONALD THOMPSON, Regional Director, JONOTHAN DOBRE, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-61088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doyon v. USA, et al
as 08-51220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURIER JOSEPH DOYON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in its Official Capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, in its Official Capacity, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
