Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Russ et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Washington
Defendant:
FNU Russ, Lt. FNU Glover, FNU Kelce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winbush v. Washington et al
as 5:2022cv06217
Plaintiff:
Javonpe Winbush
Defendant:
D Washington and L Hassen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Castle Credit Co Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha D. Washington
Defendant:
Castle Credit Co Holdings, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Washington v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
as 4:2022cv02884
Plaintiff:
Joel D Washington
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Washington v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Washington
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Washington v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00509
Petitioner:
Leroy D. Washington
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Washington v. Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
Keymoshon D Washington
Defendant:
Probation & Parole and Edward Esters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Leroy D. Washington
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
