Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Glenn v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00350
Petitioner: Coy D. Glenn
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn v. US Bank NA
as 3:2015cv03762
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn D Glenn
Defendant: US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Siller et al v. Maass et al
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff: Gary J Siller , Leonard Bedell , Richard Devries and others
Defendant: Alexander Maass and Alexa Maass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bagby v. David,et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff: Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant: G S David, D Glenn and Deana R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. David,et al
as 5:2014cv00741
Plaintiff: Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant: G. S. David, Deana R. Davis and D. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Glenn
as 6:2014mc00013
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Garland D. Glenn, II
Burns Boyd v. D. Glenn, et al
as 12-11192
Plaintiff - Appellant: BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee: D. GLENN, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, DEANA R. DAVIS, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas and KENNETH C. HOLT, B
Burns Boyd v. D. Glenn, et al
as 10-10733
Plaintiff - Appellant: BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee: D. GLENN, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, DEANA R. DAVIS, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas and KENNETH C. HOLT, B
Burns Boyd v. D. Glenn, et al
as 10-10532
Plaintiff - Appellant: BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee: D GLENN, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, DEANA R DAVIS, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas and KENNETH C HOLT, B
R. Johnson v. Paul Sloan, et al
as 09-11156
Plaintiff - Appellant: R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL SLOAN, JAMIE BAKER, J. SELLS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?