Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hack v. Wright
as 22-20177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Hack, derivatively on behalf of Conn's Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
Theodore M. Wright, Bobby L. Martin, Jon E.M. Jacoby and others
Appellant:
Richard A. Dohn
95250 Canada Ltee v. Wright et al
as 4:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
95250 Canada Ltee
Defendant:
Theodore M. Wright, Bob L. Martin, Jon E.M. Jacoby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hack v. Wright et al
as 4:2014cv03442
Plaintiff:
Robert Hack
Defendant:
Theodore M. Wright, Bob L. Martin, Jon E.M. Jacoby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America ex rel Henry Roop v. Southern Pharmaceutical Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel Henry Roop
Defendant:
Southern Pharmaceutical Corporation, Glenn A. Lingle and Douglas E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Roop v. Southern Pharmaceutical Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Henry Roop
Defendant:
Southern Pharmaceutical Corporation, Glenn Lingle and Douglas E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barnes et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05582
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company of Georgia, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Allison Shree Barnes, Allison Shree Barnes, Allison Shree Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barnes et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Allison Shree Barnes, Thomas Lewis Barnes, Clarence Beamon and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
