Cases 1 - 10 of 23,822
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50479
Petitioner:
Edward Lopez Vasquez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 24-10523
Plaintiff:
Edward Brockman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Sharron Wilson, Assistant Prosecutor William Knight and others
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20261
Petitioner:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Sugar Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Louisiana v. Garland
as 24-30359
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Mary Cheng, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Benson v. Lumpkin
as 24-50471
Petitioner:
Antoine Sharod Benson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Reese v. Martinez
as 24-50470
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Warden, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
