Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garza v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garza
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Gregory Strickland, Daniel Longoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 5:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garza
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Joey Marlowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renee v. Peralez, III et al
as 7:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Autumn Renee
Defendant:
Felipe Santiago Peralez, III, Geovani Hernandez, Ramon Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Garza
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Elizabeth Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Garza
as 7:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Elizabeth Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Garza
as 7:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Elizabeth Garza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Garza v. Sonic Restaurants Inc
as 4:2012cv02841
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garza
Defendant:
Sonic Restaurants Inc, Diana Austin and Michael Brenham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Garza et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2011cv03504
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Garza and Elizabeth Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
