Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv02576
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc and others
Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Compucom Systems Inc et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv02948
Defendant:
NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
CompuCom Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02948
Plaintiff:
Compucom Systems Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011xc02948
Defendant:
NEC Lcd Technologies Ltd, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
CompuCom Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv02576
Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.