Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hawkins v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00149
Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cecelia A. Hawkins
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LaCrystal Hubbard and Krisha D. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hubbard et al v. General Dynamics
as 2:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
LaCrystal Hubbard and Krisha D. Hollingsworth
Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Radford v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Radford and Jeffrey E. Radford
Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thomason et al v. Ayrton et al
as 2:2007cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Thomason and Melissa J Thomason
Defendant:
Halstead B Ayrton, General Dynamics Information Technology Inc and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
