Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SMITH v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN SMITH
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goldman Sachs Bank USA v. Carter et al
as 3:2024cv02021
Defendant:
Todd W Carter and Robert W Carter
Plaintiff:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Daniel v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Cody James Daniel
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
mCom IP, LLC v. Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
as 4:2022cv03821
Plaintiff:
mCom IP, LLC
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
