Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Grams v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 4:2022cv02895
Plaintiff:
Garnet Grams and June Grams
Defendant:
Capital One Bank and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Davila v. Garnet
as 1:2020cv00111
Plaintiff:
Julia Davila
Defendant:
Judy Boe Garnet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blue World Construction, Inc. v. GMA Garnet USA
as 4:2019cv03538
Defendant:
GMA Garnet USA
Plaintiff:
Blue World Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv11705
Plaintiff:
Garnet Adams
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. GMA Garnet USA Corp.
as 2:2017cv10789
Plaintiff:
Otis L. Anderson, Jr. and Kimberly Jupiter Geason
Defendant:
GMA Garnet USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trahan, et al. v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
as 1:2016cv00171
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Medtronic, Inc.
Interested Party:
David Tyler Key
Plaintiff:
Clarence Joseph Trahan and Garnet Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cruz v. Navika Capital Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
Dany Cruz
Defendant:
Garnet Hospitality, Inc., Kohinoor Hospitality, Inc., Lotustel Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
