Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Moses Smith, Jr. v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEPHENS, B. PARKER, GARY HUNTER and others
Ysidro Valencia v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-41436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YSIDRO VALENCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, GARY HUNTER, WAYNE BREWER and others
Humphrey v. Hunter et al
as 9:2016cv00043
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Gary Hunter, Donald Muniz, Richard Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Hunter et al
as 9:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Defendant:
Gary Hunter, Donald Muniz, Michael Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses Smith, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-40778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, B. PARKER, GARY HUNTER and others
Jesus Jimenez v. Gary Hunter, et al
as 15-50206
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS JAIME JIMENEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY HUNTER, Senior Warden and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Humphrey v. Hunter et al
as 9:2015cv00037
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Gary Hunter, Donald Muniz, Richard Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wynn v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Arthur Wynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Gary Hunter, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosea v. Alford et al
as 9:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Hosea
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Gary Hunter, Michael Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Moses Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
William Stephens, B Parker, Gary Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
