Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Hodges v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robin Hodges
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Hodges
as 3:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demontez Hodges
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hodges v. Young
as 5:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gary Hodges
Defendant:
Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodges v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Hodges
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Jewel Simmons, Herbert Young and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lizana v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lizana
Defendant:
Troy Peterson, Evan Hubbard, S. Lege and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hodges
as 3:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andre Hodges
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hodges v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
William Luke Hodges
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Mountain Laurel Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hodges v. Pennington
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frederic Hodges
Defendant:
Christine Louise Pennington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States of America v. Hodges
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amber Hodges
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
