Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Chavez-Villatoro v. Garland
as 23-60559
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Chavez-Villatoro
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust v. Chavez et al
as 5:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Chavez, Jr and Cherie Marie Chavez-Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chavez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 22-60567
Petitioner:
Jose Oscar Chavez-Dominguez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Aurorach Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02008
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Aurorach, Inc. d/b/a Touchdown Sports Grill, Jose Alfredo Chavez, OCTAVIO L AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
Chavez v. Tyson Foods
as 21-11110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maria Yolanda Chavez, Individually and on behalf of Minor LC and Estate of Jose Angel Chavez, Angel Chavez and Rita Elaine Cowan, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Thomas David Cowan
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyson Foods, Incorporated, doing business as Tyson Foods and Tyson Fresh Meats, Incorporated
USA v. Chavez
as 21-60008
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Chavez, also known as Big Head
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Chavez v. Neal Unit
as 2:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jose M Chavez
Defendant:
Neal Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duvall et al v. Neal Unit
as 2:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Robert Duvall, Mike Masten, Tyrus N Green and others
Defendant:
Neal Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00126
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Chavez-Dominguez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60834
Petitioner:
JOSE OSCAR CHAVEZ-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Jose Oscar Dominguez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
