Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nunez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Nunez
Defendant:
United States of America and J Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Anciso
as 23-40494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Pricsylla Anciso, Correctional Officer Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Juan Nunez, Deputy Warden Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Skinner Sturgis, Captain Deputy Warden Texas Department of Corrections and others
Thomas v. Anciso et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Pricsylla Anciso, Juan Nunez, Skinner Sturgis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Trevino et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Rosalinda Trevino and Juan Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Juan Nunez and Shelly Nunez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Martin Jackie Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Donna F Bryant, Lorie Davis, Cody Wolfrum and others
Plaintiff:
Keith H. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Lone Star Tiling LLC et al
as 4:2018cv04610
Defendant:
Lt Juan Nunez, LONE STAR TILING LLC and Y-SQUARE DESIGN BUILD, LLC
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. Seale et al
as 5:2014cv00042
Defendant:
Sgt. Hurshal W. Feazel, Major Juan Nunez and Warden Samuel D. Seale
Plaintiff:
Danyel Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Morales et al
as 5:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kerry Franco
Defendant:
Paul Morales, Juan Nunez, Adam Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
