Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Camacho III v. Ma.Elvia Alvarez Ibarra et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
OSCAR A. CAMACHO III
Defendant:
MA ELVIRA ALVAREZ IBARRA D/B/A TRANSPORTES PAMAR and MARIO PEREZ-MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Perez
as 24-10099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Perez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Reliable Wireline, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04369
Plaintiff:
Mario Perez
Defendant:
Reliable Wireline, LLC and Brandon Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
USA v. Ramirez-Perez
as 21-50641
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Ramirez-Perez, also known as X Unknown, also known as Mario Ramirez Perez, also known as Mario Perez-Ramirez
Perez-Velasquez v. Garland
as 21-60319
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mario Perez-Velasquez
PHP Agency Inc v. Martinez et al
as 3:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Maria Elizarraga, Jose Martinez, Tony Martinez and others
Not Classified By Court:
PHP Agency, Inc. and ADR Provider
Plaintiff:
PHP Agency Inc
3Rd Party Defendant:
Hector Del Toro, Erika Del Toro, Ricardo Aguilar and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.532 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Librado Encarnacion Perez, Candelaria Perez Ruiz, Ida Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Perez v. USA
as 4:2018cv00542
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Mario Perez
as 18-10764
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO PEREZ, also known as Nicholas Eguia, also known as Nicolas Eguia, also known as Mario Prez, also known as Nicholas Eduia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
