Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Henry v. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Lashandra Henry and Lashandra D. Henry
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retail Inc, Millard Mall Services Inc, Brookfield Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henry v. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Lashandra Henry
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retail Inc, Millard Mall Services Inc, Brookfield Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rahgozar v. Brookfield Properties Retails, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04390
Plaintiff:
Pegah Rahgozar
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retails, Inc., Brookfield Properties (R) LLC, Brookfield Properties REIT Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lee v. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
Ladetra Lee
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. and Millard Mall Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. Baybrook Mall, L.L.C.
as 4:2021cv01340
Defendant:
Baybrook Mall, L.L.C. and Millard Mall Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeArmond v. Brookfield Properties Retail Inc. et. al
as 3:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Mall of Louisiana, LLC, Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc., Millard Mall Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Vickie DeArmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buford v. Northpark Mall Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Nancy Buford
Defendant:
Northpark Mall Limited Partnership, Northpark Mall Operating Company, L.L.C., Northpark Residual 1, L.L.C. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Northpark Mall Limited Partnership, Northpark Mall Operating Company, L.L.C. and Northpark Residual 1, L.L.C.
ThirdParty Defendant:
Millard Mall Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
