Cases 1 - 10 of 585
McClendon et al v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Monica McClendon individually and A/N/F/ of K.M., a minor
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gallegos
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Monica M Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes et al v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Reyes, Federico Torres, Jr., Azeneth Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Sergeant Juan Maldonado, Crimson Elizondo, Richard Bogdanski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abboud v. Lotta Dough, LLC
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
Lotta Dough, LLC d/b/a Hoboken Pie
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Angulo et al v. Gravity Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Monica Angulo
Defendant:
Gravity Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Olivo v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Olivo
Defendant:
Susan B Reed, Monica Comitsky, Karmen Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanks et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 5:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Monica Hanks and Lone Star Fast Funding, LLC
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hartman v. First Bank, et al.
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Monica Hartman
Defendant:
Southern Hills Property Group
Garnishee:
First Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shed v. Fiesta Mart, LLC
as 4:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
MONICA SHED
Defendant:
FIESTA MART, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
