Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Arnesen v. Raimondo
as 24-60055
Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., William Copeland and others
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, NMFS Assistant Administrator and others
Amicus Curiae: Cato Institute
Louisiana Shrimp Association et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Not Yet Classified: Louisiana Shrimp Association, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Gina Raimondo and others
Plaintiff: John Brown, Larry Helmer, Jr. and Penny V. Zar
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jurisich Oysters, LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Jurisich Oysters, LLC, Ameripure Processing Company, Inc., Matthew Tesvich and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Bell et al v. Raimondo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Janet Coit and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff: George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Def of Wildlife v. U.S. Army Corps
as 23-60033
Plaintiff / Appellee: Defenders of Wildlife and Healthy Gulf
Defendant / Appellant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Louisiana State v. NOAA
as 22-30799
Plaintiff / Appellant: Louisiana State, by and through Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
Defendant / Appellee: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Richard Spinrad, Administrator, Chris Oliver, In His Official Capacity as Assistant Administrator For Fisheries, Samuel D. Rauch, III, In His Official Capacity as Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs and others
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Coit et al
as 2:2022cv01117
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc. doing business as Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: Janet Coit, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant: American Petroleum Institute, EnerGeo Alliance, Chevron USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mexican Gulf v. U.S. Dept of Com
as 22-30105
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, partially owned by Billy Wells, Billy Wells, Captain, partially owns Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, A&B Charters Incorporated, owned by Allen Walburn and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, a scientific agency within the Department of Commerce and others
Louisiana State v. Department of Commerce et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01523
Petitioner: State of Louisiana
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Richard Spinrad, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration and others
Plaintiff: Louisiana State
Amicus Curiae: Center for Biological Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network and Defenders of Wildlife
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?