Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Bealefield v. Odem et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward Bealefield
Defendant:
Whitney Odem, Chastiny D Harris and Donzell Labrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Townsend
as 23-40583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Senior Warden, Major Michael A. Collum, Assistant Warden, Melissa J. Mortensen, Case Manager II and others
Odem v. Johnson
as 23-10884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarvis O. Johnson, Mailroom Supervisor, French Robertson Unit, Stanley Baldwin, Head Chaplaincy, French Robertson Unit, Paige Rutledge, Admin IV and others
Odem v. Townsend
as 23-40495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Senior Warden, Major Michael A. Collum, Assistant Warden, Melissa J. Mortensen, Case Manager II and others
Odem v. UTMB
as 6:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Odem
Defendant:
UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lander v. Odom et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Peter E. Lander
Defendant:
Stephen W. Odem, Jr., The Impact Partnership LLC, Matt Dorminey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Odem v. Chapa et al
as 2:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Odem
Defendant:
Armando Chapa, Heather and Sandra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Lumpkin
as 22-10984
Petitioner / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Odem v. Lumpkin
as 22-10950
Petitioner / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Odem v. Odom
as 22-10908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frances M. Odom, Unit Property Officer, Kelly M. Brown, Unit Property Officer and Samantha K. Sullivan, AD Review (Investigator 2)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
