Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Saunders v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Timothy Saunders
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation and Harris Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tucker v. Progress Software Corporation
as 2:2023cv04980
Plaintiff: Reina Tucker
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
McAdam v. Progress Software Corporation
as 2:2023cv02295
Plaintiff: Annie McAdam
Defendant: PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Berry v. Progress Software Corporation
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff: JASON BERRY
Defendant: PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 United States Computer Fraud Abuse Act
Pherah, LLC v. Progress Software Corporation
as 6:2016cv00994
Plaintiff: Pherah, LLC
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
QualiQode, LLC v. Progress Software Corporation
as 2:2014cv00183
Plaintiff: QualiQode, LLC
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Juxtacomm-Texas Software, LLC v. Axway, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00011
Defendant: Axway, Inc., Lawson Software, Inc., Office Depot, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Magic Software Enterprises, Ltd., Magic Software Enterprises, Inc., Lawson Software Americas, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Counter Defendant: JuxtaComm-Texas Software, LLC and JuxtaComm Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Shopplex.com Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Keirn v. Progress Software Corporation
as 4:2008cv00201
Plaintiff: Jimi Keirn
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?