Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Raymond JohnsonIn re: Raymond Johnson
as 20-20366
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND TIERRA JOHNSON, also known as "T"
Raymond Johnson v. Town North Nissan Incorporated
as 18-50398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN NORTH NISSAN INCORPORATED
Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2017cv00808
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Johnson v. Town North Nissan Inc.
as 1:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Johnson
Defendant:
Town North Nissan Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Verrengia
as 1:2017cv00295
Defendant:
Dream Cars Austin and Tony Verrengia
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv00776
Petitioner:
Raymond Tierra Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01134
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott Johnson
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Boos, et al v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 10-50353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD O. BOOS, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, RAYMOND D. JOHNSON, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated and WANDA N. MYERS, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, INC., BELLSOUTH CORP and BELLSOUTH TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN
Boos et al v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2009mc00018
Plaintiff:
Donald O Boos, Donald O Boos, Donald O Boos and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Bellsouth Corporation and The Bellsouth Telephone Concession Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
