Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Garza v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv03540
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03381
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza v. The United States of America
as 4:2023cv03380
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Garza
as 23-40490
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric Richard Garza
USA v. Garza
as 21-40759
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric Richard Garza
USA v. Garza
as 21-20213
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Garza
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Garza v. General Star National Insurance Company et al
as 5:2017cv01047
Plaintiff:
Richard Garza
Defendant:
General Star National Insurance Company and Michael Koehler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
USA v. Richard Garza
as 16-41470
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD GARZA
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Huffaker et al v. Cuna Mutual Group et al
as 3:2016cv00109
Defendant:
CMFG Life Insurance Company a/k/a CUNA Mutual Group, Cuna Mutual Group and Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Terry Garcia, Gonzalo Garza-Pena, Richard Garza-Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
