Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wilmoth v. Azar
as 21-60351
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Azar, in his official capacity of Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Wilmoth, Jr.
John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, President, et al
as 18-20440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. DIERLAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Roman Catholic Diocese, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 14-10661
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORTH WORTH, CATHOLIC CHARITIES, DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH, INCORPORATED, UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THOMAS PEREZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and others
Roman Catholic Diocese, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 14-10241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
