Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vaughn Monroe v. John Doe, et al
as 16-20503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAUGHN MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, I - Director - University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas, DR. L. LINTHICUM, Medical Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas and others
Monroe v. Doe et al
as 4:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Monroe
Defendant:
John Doe, Brad Livingston, L. Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv03309
Plaintiff:
Steve Miller
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Waller v. Miller et al
as 9:2011cv00128
Defendant:
Steve Miller , Stephen Barlow , Preston McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Steven K Waller
Amicu:
Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Miller et al
as 6:2011cv00378
Defendant:
Steve Miller , Stephen Barlow , Preston McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Steven K Waller
Amicu:
Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Currie et al
as 9:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Gary L Currie, Cody Ginsel, Steve Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Reed, III v. Steve Miller
as 10-41022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. REED, III, also known as Dwight Byrd
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE MILLER, Warden
Charles Reed, III v. Steve Miller, et al
as 10-41025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. REED, III, also known as Dwight Byrd
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE MILLER, Warden and STEPHEN BRYANT, Major
Rosfel Garza v. Markette Miller, et al
as 10-20633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSFEL GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARKETTE MILLER, JORDAN BONNE, KENNETH DOSSEY and others
Reed v. Miller
as 9:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles W Reed, III
Defendant:
Steve Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
