Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rogers v. Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Barbara Rogers
Defendant:
Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01069
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Booker v. LLOG Exploration Company, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Clinton Booker
Defendant:
LLOG Exploration Company, L.L.C. and Bailey Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Sikorsky Support Services, Inc dba Sikorsky Aero-Space Maintenance, United Technologies Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Sikorsky
as 2:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Manuel Anderson
Defendant:
Sikorsky Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Crane v. Lithia TO, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Brian Crane
Defendant:
Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc., Lithia Motors, Inc. and Lithia TO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
