Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hitel Technologies LLC v. The Mens Wearhouse, LLC
as 6:2020cv01209
Defendant:
The Mens Wearhouse, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Listou Search Technologies LLC v. The Mens Wearhouse, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Listou Search Technologies LLC
Defendant:
The Mens Wearhouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Mens Wearhouse Inc.
as 2:2014cv00457
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Mens Wearhouse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eclipse IP LLC v. Men's Wearhouse Inc
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
Men's Wearhouse Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Men's Wearhouse Inc. vs. Ethernet Innovations LLC
as 4:2010cv04455
Plaintiff:
The Men's Wearhouse Inc
Defendant:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Landmark Technology LLC v. Blockbuster Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00302
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology LLC
Defendant:
Blockbuster Inc., Casio America, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Material Yard Workers Local 1175 Benefit Funds v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03265
Plaintiff:
Material Yard Workers Local 1175 Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Men's Wearhouse, Inc., George Zimmer and Neill P Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Constanza v. The Men's Wearhouse, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Flor Constanza
Defendant:
The Men's Wearhouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Butler v. K & G Men's Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
Anthony Butler
Defendant:
K & G Men's Company, Inc., K & G Men's Company, Inc., The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
