Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ibrihim v. FMC Fort Worth Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth Warden, Dewun Settle, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neira v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00271
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshals Office
Petitioner:
James Adam Neira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Felts v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv00420
Petitioner:
Kevin Felts
Respondent:
Jose Vasquez and U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burman v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00561
Petitioner:
ALLAH A. BURMAN
Respondent:
Eric Holder, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goss v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Teffin C. Goss, II
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goss v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Teffin C. Goss, II
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Renteria v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00090
Petitioner:
Javier Renteria
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glaude v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Reginald Glaude
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parks v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv00250
Petitioner:
Gerry Parks
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jaghameh v. Warden, RCDC III et al
as 4:2010cv00085
Respondent:
Mr. Bullock, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Warden, RCDC III
Petitioner:
Mohammed Ibrahim Jaghameh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
