Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joe Frederick v. Vernon Pittman, et al
as 15-20007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE FREDERICK
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN VERNON PITTMAN, MAJOR MARK R. CLARKE, LIEUTENANT JAMES POWERS and others
Tuft v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Tuft
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Vernon Pittman, Jeorld Braggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derek Montez v. Cody Hampton, et al
as 13-20331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK WAYNE MONTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CODY HAMPTON, CLARA ANDERSON, BRUCE BAGGETT and others
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 12-20772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, BRENDA CHANEY, former Warden of Jester 3 Unit, KATHREN GONZALES, Lieutenant of Correctional Office at the Jester 3 Unit and others
Derwin Wynn v. Vernon Pittman, et al
as 12-20734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERWIN WADE WYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON PITTMAN, Senior Warden, W. SAMARNEH, Practice Manager, BOX, Practice Manager and others
Jenkins v. Uashaw et al
as 4:2012cv01293
Petitioner:
Charles Jenkins
Respondent:
Michael Uashaw, Vernon Pittman and Buddy Heuermann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinones v. Livingston et al
as 4:2011cv04292
Plaintiff:
Quinones Hipolito
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Vernon Pittman and R Yap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montez v. Hampton et al
as 4:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
Derek Wayne Montez
Defendant:
Cody Hampton, Clara Anderson, Bruce Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Pittman et al
as 4:2011cv00991
Plaintiff:
Derwin Wade Wynn
Defendant:
Vernon Pittman, W Samarneh, Ms Box and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, VERNON PITTMAN, Warden-Jester 3, JEROLD BRAGGS, Assistant Warden, Jester 3 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
