Cases 1 - 10 of 38,084
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Martita Martinez
Defendant:
Daena Nicole Gonzalez and City of Progreso, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Babino et al
as 4:2024cv01796
Defendant:
Joseph Babino and HARRIS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shields v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Shields et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields and Corrections Officer JOHN DOE ONE
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bibb v. Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Malynda Bibb
Defendant:
Anderson Merchandisers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Valadez, III v. Patten et al
as 5:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Valadez, III
Defendant:
Bryan Patten, Officer Flores and The City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
