Cases 91 - 100 of 159
Kennath Henderson v. Wayne Carpenter
as 14-5911
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNATH ARTEZ HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WAYNE CARPENTER, Warden
Jobey Henderson v. Carrous Robinson
as 14-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOBEY L. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARROUS FREDERICK ROBINSON
Tellis Williams v. Jerrell Jones, et al
as 14-5182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TELLIS T. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRELL JONES, Captain, SUSAN REECE, Nurse, BRANDON SMITH, Nurse and others
Michigan Corrections Organiza, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION, (MCO), Service Employees International Union, Local 526M, LORI AUGUSTINE, DENNIS BEECHAM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DANIEL H. HEYNS, acting in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections
Dax Womack v. Matt Conley, et al
as 13-6565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAX R. WOMACK
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT CONLEY, Kentucky State Police, In his Individual and Official Capacity, STEPHANIE CONLEY, Department for Community Based Services, In her Individual and Official Capacity, CONNIE KNIGHT, Individually and as an Agent of the Kentucky State Police and others
Dana Rister v. Mike Wisley, et al
as 13-4032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA RISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WISLEY, R. BROWN, KIM HENDERSON and others
In re: Jobey Henderson
as 13-1391
Movant:
In re: JOBEY L. HENDERSON
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
USA v. Tyrone Henderson
as 13-1306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TYRONE HENDERSON
Jobey Henderson v. Catherine Bauman
as 12-1893
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOBEY L. HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
USA v. Malcolm Henderson
as 12-5792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MALCOLM HENDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
