Cases 11 - 20 of 2,316
Rachel Kaltenbach, et al v. Hilliard City Schools, et al
as 24-3336
Plaintiff:
RACHEL KALTENBACH, DANIEL KAMENTO, SARAH KAMENTO and others
Defendant:
HILLIARD CITY SCHOOLS, HILLIARD CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, BETH MURDOCH, in her official capacity as Board President for the Hilliard City Schools Board of Education and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelly Key v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
KELLY ROYCE KEY
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER
Michael McIntosh, et al v. City of Madisonville, KY
as 24-5383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCINTOSH and REBECCA MCINTOSH
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISONVILLE, KY
David Little v. City of Saginaw, MI, et al
as 24-1335
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM LITTLE
Defendant:
CITY OF SAGINAW, MI, JORDAN LADOUCE, Police Officer and STEVEN LAUTNER, Police Officer
Charles Crable v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 24-3316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. CRABLE
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER ROBERT ALFORD, #510 and OFFICER ISAIAH PARKER, #1572
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lathfield Investments, LLC, et al v. City of Lathrup Village, MI, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
LATHFIELD INVESTMENTS, LLC, LATHFIELD HOLDINGS, LLC and LATHFIELD PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI and LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5341
Plaintiff:
CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, REGGIE EDGE, JR., in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol and CHARLES ACHINGER, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
