Cases 41 - 50 of 567
USA v. David Lewis
as 22-5673
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER LEWIS
Derrick Lewis v. Kingsport Police Department, et al
as 22-5665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LAMAR LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KINGSPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, BEN DEGREEN, Officer and others
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
William Lanham v. USA
as 22-5597
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS LANHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Edward Lewis
as 22-5593
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD LEONIDAS LEWIS
USA v. Steve Newell
as 22-5578
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVE LEWIS NEWELL
Vaughn Harris, et al v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 22-5541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAUGHN HARRIS
Plaintiff:
LACORY LYTLE and BOBBY JAMES MOSLEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, SHERIFF DARON HALL, STAFF OF SHERIFF DARON HALL and others
Phillip Velasquez v. Mike Lewis
as 22-5526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP VELASQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE LEWIS
Will McLemore, et al v. Roxana Gumucio, et al
as 22-5458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILL MCLEMORE, MCLEMORE AUCTION COMPANY, LLC, AARON MCKEE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROXANA GUMUCIO, GLENN KOPCHAK, JOHN THORPE and others
Julie Helphenstine v. Lewis County, KY, et al
as 22-5407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIE HELPHENSTINE, Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Dale Helphenstine and Guardian of B.D.H., the minor son of Christopher Dale Helphenstine
Defendant / Appellee:
LEWIS COUNTY, KY, JEFF LYKINS, Individually, ANTHONY RUARK, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
