Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Howard Fisher v. James Holloway, et al
as 17-5516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD PORTER FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden, DICKENSON, Warden and DR. COX
Jerome McDougald v. Esham, et al
as 17-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME MCDOUGALD
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ESHAM, LIEUTENANT JOSEPH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER QUEEN and others
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Kentucky State Reformatory Warden, LT. DEANNA HAWKINS, SERGEANT KELLEY and others
USA v. Robert Porter
as 17-5064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT PORTER
Liberty Coins, LLC, et al v. Jacqueline Williams, et al
as 16-3735
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTY COINS, JOHN MICHAEL TOMASO, WORTHINGTON JEWELERS, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JACQUELINE T. WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Director, Ohio Department of Commerce and AMANDA MCCARTNEY, in her offical capacity as Consumer Finance Attorney of Division of Financial Institutions, Ohio Department of Commerce
Defendant:
DAVID GOODMAN and ANDRE PORTER
In re: Quincey Blank
as 16-5906
Movant:
In re: QUINCEY LESHUN BLANKS, aka Quincey Porter, aka Kevin Wilson, aka David Lee
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Derrick Porter v. USA
as 16-3331
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK PORTER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Elgene Porter v. Kevin Genovese
as 16-5317
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELGENE KENTAE PORTER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN GENOVESE
Dawan Thurmond v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 16-1223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUSAN P. WARD-WITKOWSKI and others
Kerry Porter v. Louisville Jefferson Cnty Gov
as 16-5010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT
Movant - Appellant:
JUAN SANDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
