Cases 51 - 60 of 623
Phillip JacobsIn re: Phillip Jacobs
as 23-3054
Petitioner:
In re: PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Respondent:
HAROLD MAY
Phillip WatkinsIn re: Phillip Watkins
as 23-3006
Petitioner:
In re: PHILLIP WATKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Leatha Taylor, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 22-6078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEATHA TAYLOR, Individually and as Administratrix of Estate of David Taylor, KATHY BARNES, LISA ARLENE PEOPLES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Phillip Watkins v. USA
as 22-4000
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Phillip Green
as 22-6028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP THOMAS GREEN
Ronnell LeberryIn re: Ronnell Leberry
as 22-6003
Petitioner:
In re: RONNELL JASON DUPREE LEBERRY
Respondent:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Jill Hile, et al v. Michigan, et al
as 22-1986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL HILE, SAMANTHA JACOKES, PHILLIP JACOKES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, in her official capacity and RACHAEL EUBANKS, Michigan Treasurer, in her official capacity
USA v. Phillip Cabbage
as 22-3889
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP CABBAGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dominique Johnson v. USA, et al
as 22-5863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Former Warden USP McCreary, JOHN DOE, being sued as Captain (during 2020), USP McCreary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
