Cases 61 - 70 of 179
David Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 16-3907
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID A. HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Terrence Matthews v. Steven Merlak, et al
as 16-3761
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRENCE MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paul Weakley v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 16-5627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL RAYMOND WEAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Lee, Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Big Sandy, Unknown Officer at Big-Sandy, and R.P screening room, UNKNOWN HOBBS, UNKNOWN BAKER, Counselors and others
Mike Settle v. BOP, et al
as 16-5297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and DOUGLAS STEPHENS, Individually
Mike Settle v. BOP, et al
as 16-5279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN HAMBY
Marcus Johnson v. Marcedes Harding, et al
as 16-5193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS T. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCEDES HARDING, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Don Bradford v. Matthew Mellady, et al
as 15-5480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON MONTRAIL BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW MELLADY, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI GILMER, BLANCHE BONG COOK and others
Robert Murillo v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 15-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. MURILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General's Office, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, J. A. TERRIS, Warden, Warden and others
William Thrower v. USA, et al
as 14-6514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THROWER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, USP MCCREARY and others
Don Bradford v. Matthew Mellady, et al
as 14-6347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON MONTRAIL BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW MELLADY, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI GILMER, BLANCHE BONG COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
