Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Milton Simpson v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 15-6154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON LEON SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, former Tennessee Governor, WILLIAM OLDHAM, "Bill"-Shelby County Sheriff, ROBERT MOORE, Chief of Jail Operations and others
Raymond Carr v. Raymond Booker, et al
as 14-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEON CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden, DARRELL STEWARD, Deputy Warden, CORNELL HOWARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alieah Ward, et al v. Shelby County Sheriff's Depart, et al
as 12-6331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALIEAH WARD, CARLEY ADAMS and LAURA OSWALT, as Next of Kin of David Oswalt, deceased
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, f, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Townsend v. Samuel Mays, Jr., et al
as 11-6547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ATREL TOWNSEND, aka Abdullah Rafiz Shaheed Ashanti
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge, FRED GODWIN, Assistant U.S. Attorney and S.A. ANDREW HUCKSTADT, F.B.I.
Godwin Mutinta v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-3520
Petitioner:
GODWIN MUTINTA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Godwin Chungag, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 11-1353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GODWIN CHUNGAG and IRENE S. CHUNGAG
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., dba Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Terrance Burke v. City of Memphis, et al
as 10-6487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE T. BURKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, W. W. HERENTON, MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
